USA Daily Letter
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

USA Daily Letter

Politics

Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship blocked by another federal appeals judge in latest ruling

by July 26, 2025
July 26, 2025
Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship blocked by another federal appeals judge in latest ruling

A federal appeals judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship for the children of people in the country illegally or temporarily. 

U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that a nationwide injunction on the Trump administration’s effort to end birthright citizenship that he issued earlier this year and that was granted to more than a dozen states can stand. 

Sorokin said the ruling was an exception to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limited lower courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions. The issue is expected to return to the Supreme Court.  

Trump and the administration ‘are entitled to pursue their interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and no doubt the Supreme Court will ultimately settle the question,’ Sorokin wrote in his ruling. ‘But in the meantime, for purposes of this lawsuit at this juncture, the Executive Order is unconstitutional.’

The Trump administration has argued that children born in the U.S. to parents in the country illegally and temporarily are not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship. 

Trump signed the birthright citizenship executive order, along with a slew of other orders, on his first day in office in January. 

On Wednesday, the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals also affirmed the lower court’s nationwide injunction, and, earlier this month, a New Hampshire federal judge issued a ruling prohibiting Trump’s executive order from taking effect nationwide in a new class-action lawsuit.

Sorokin disagreed with the Trump administration’s argument that the Supreme Court’s ruling warranted a narrower ruling. 

The plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit argued that Trump’s executive order is unconstitutional because the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship, and it also threatens millions of dollars in state funding for ‘essential’ health insurance services contingent on citizenship status. 

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Michelle Obama portraitist’s exhibit with trans Statue of Liberty pulled after pressure from Vance
next post
Europeans meet with Iranian officials face-to-face for first time since Israel, US bombings as sanctions loom

You may also like

House panel directs chairman to subpoena Bill and...

Details of Trump’s highly anticipated AI plan revealed...

Europeans meet with Iranian officials face-to-face for first...

Pro-Israel Dem says those who won’t decry Hamas...

Russia bombards Ukraine hours before key meeting on...

Fed Chair Jerome Powell hit with criminal referral...

AI arms race: US and China weaponize drones,...

DOJ forms Russiagate ‘strike force’ to investigate declassified...

‘Not going away’: Inside the Epstein drama that’s...

Huckabee hits back at Western countries that ‘side’...

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Trump signs rescissions package, closes out week with trip to Scotland

    • CHARLIE KIRK: Republicans must seize Gen Z moment or risk losing an entire generation

    • Top 5 Canadian Mining Stocks This Week: St. Augustine Gains 67 Percent

    • Europeans meet with Iranian officials face-to-face for first time since Israel, US bombings as sanctions loom

    • Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship blocked by another federal appeals judge in latest ruling

    Categories

    • Business (10)
    • Investing (66)
    • Politics (83)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: usadailyletter.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 usadailyletter.com | All Rights Reserved


    Back To Top