USA Daily Letter
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

USA Daily Letter

Politics

Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

by September 8, 2025
September 8, 2025
Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

President Donald Trump is still facing a $83.3 million payment to writer E. Jean Carroll after a federal appeals court rejected his challenge of a defamation verdict against him Monday.

The ruling from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a lower court decision finding that Trump did, in fact, defame Carroll. Trump’s lawyers argued his comments about Carroll were protected by presidential immunity and that the verdict in the case was unjust. The three-judge panel rejected both of those claims.

‘We conclude that Trump has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity. We also conclude that the district court did not err in any of the challenged rulings and that the jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable,’ the court opinion read.

‘The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that the ‘the degree of reprehensibility’ of Mr. Trump’s conduct was remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented,’ the court added.

Carroll sued Trump twice after she released a book in 2019, which claimed Trump raped her during a brief encounter with him in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

Trump vigorously denied the claims, saying he had never met Carroll, that she was not his ‘type’ and that she fabricated the incident to sell books. His vocal and repeated criticisms and denials led to Carroll’s defamation allegations.

Monday’s ruling comes months after the same court rejected Trump’s appeal in another Carroll-related case. In that appeal, Trump challenged evidence that Carroll’s legal team introduced to the jury during the civil lawsuit, including the Access Hollywood tape that surfaced during Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The full panel of judges declined to hear Trump’s argument, however, forcing the president to either accept defeat or appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read the full ruling below (App users click here)

Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Blackrock Silver Announces Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Tonopah West Project
next post
LAPD ends Kamala Harris security after union backlash over elite officer use: report

You may also like

With friends like these pushing to dismantle Trump’s...

Federal judges anonymously criticize Supreme Court for overturning...

RFK Jr. invokes Democrat father’s words to defend...

Dems flood defense bill with far-left amendments aimed...

A closer look at Air Force One and...

‘Delusional’: Oversight Republicans slam ex-Biden aide for lashing...

Whatever happened to: The Qatar Air Force One...

RFK Jr denies telling former CDC director to...

Barrett says justices ‘wear black, not red or...

It’s not the economy, stupid. Democrats’ real path...

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Casablanca Geophysics Highlights Antimony Targets at Depth

    • Fortune Bay: Maximizing Shareholder Value in Gold and Uranium

    • JLL Signs Non-Binding LOI to List McDermitt on a US Exchange

    • North American Mining Conferences Presentation

    • Why Does the US Federal Reserve Raise and Lower Interest Rates?

    Categories

    • Business (9)
    • Investing (71)
    • Politics (81)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: usadailyletter.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 usadailyletter.com | All Rights Reserved


    Back To Top